Copper and aluminium have carried heat out of electronics for a century. Graphene is the first material to beat both on the metric that matters in mobile, airborne and space hardware - conductivity per unit mass.

Five dimensions of comparison

DimensionGraphene plateCopperAluminium
Through-thickness conductivity (W/m·K)1200~400~200
Density (g/cm3)~1.58.92.7
Weight at equal size1x6x1.8x
Corrosion resistanceExcellentOxidises readilyModerate
Cost per unit thermal capabilityLowestHighestLow material cost, high mass cost

When to choose graphene

Choose a graphene plate when mass matters (airborne, portable, satellite), when the heat source is a concentrated hot spot that needs to be spread before it reaches a cold plate, or when CTE matching against a ceramic package matters. The through-thickness conductivity is three times copper at a fraction of the density.

When to choose copper

Copper remains the right answer where thermal mass is an advantage (transient absorption), where high mechanical strength is needed, or where the part is a general structural component with a generous mass budget. Copper is also easier to solder and braze into legacy assemblies.

When to choose aluminium

Aluminium is the default for large, cost-sensitive structures. Its conductivity is modest, but it is cheap, easy to extrude and machine, and often the enclosure is aluminium anyway so the heat path is already there.

Three advantages of the Lenecold plate

  • Conductivity per kilogram. 1200 W/m·K through-thickness at 1.5-4 g/cm³ - roughly 6x the specific conductivity of copper.
  • Tunable CTE. 4-12 ppm/K can be matched to ceramics and composites, reducing solder and die-attach fatigue.
  • Built to be stacked. The plate carries heat across the assembly while a 180 W/m·K pad crosses the gap - which is exactly how a stacked thermal path should be built.

Where the plate fits in a stack

The plate is a structural conductor, not a gap filler. In a high-power stack a 180 W/m·K pad crosses the gap between the die and the plate, and the plate carries the heat on to the cold plate or heatsink. Each layer does the job it is good at.

Send us the drawing, not a form. Tell us the footprint, the gap, the clamping pressure and the duty cycle. We will come back with a material, a thickness and a sample - including when the honest answer is a cheaper option. Talk to engineering →

Frequently asked questions

Do I still need a thermal pad if I use the plate?
Yes, in most stacks. The plate is rigid and machined, so it cannot absorb the surface variation between the package and the cold plate. A 180 W/m·K pad sits between them and the plate carries heat on to the cold plate.
Can graphene replace copper entirely?
In directed heat-spreading applications it can match or beat copper, often at a fraction of the mass. Copper keeps advantages in thermal mass, mechanical strength and legacy manufacturability, so general structural parts are usually still copper.
Is graphene more expensive?
Per unit of thermal capability it is competitive. Because the raw material is produced in-house at NGIC, the plate is positioned below the cost of a copper spreader of equivalent performance for the same application.
How do I compare two supplier claims?
Compare thermal resistance at the same pressure, bond line and temperature - not headline conductivity. Then ask for aged values and a sample you can test in your own fixture.